![]() ![]() If you steal that app, windows runs against a wall. You can leave windows without any file association, but it is not fun for the user, we got used to the luxury that certain data files will open certain app. ![]() I mean computers at home, in small offices etc. They need to run self contained in first place. So it is so far not possible to prepare every computer you visit in such way, this may be some time in future, but current workstation operating systems simply do not support such things. It might do it, but what if the connection is not there? Will the screen stay dark or what? ![]() So yes, sure you could tell windows that the file msvcrt.dll is placed on server on the other side of the world and it should go and fetch it there. If you just have a computer running on its own, and you set it up to simply work with something from the cloud only, it will work this way from now. So it simply does not work from any computer, it is a server - client set up. They can have small proprietary OS and load even the whole 'big' OS from the server on demand. Solving the problem of multiple installs etc, simply having one sigle copy of the app to be maintained and thats it.īut such terminals may, or may not even run windows as operating system, they do not run linux nor any macos, simply nothing we all know. The VMware company is using the thinapp software to portabilize big apps, place them on a server and load them on demand to the user terminals. The situation is in fact achieved, as you suggest, in similar way as portable apps work to some extend. Such network system will then provide all essential parts on boot and will then load all variables from the external position too. Computers which do run parts or whole operating system or big apps from external position do exist, but the mechanism here is run by advanced network system. If you take half of the windows functionality and transfer it to some other place, windows, as operating system on a PC, without any server supporting it, will not cope with it. Windows is so far not designed for this, it has less to do with the apps itself. I only listed these three off the top o'my head. have to administer multiple computers, and installing the same SW on more than 3 PCs is a complete drag.įeel free to think of many other such revolutionary use scenarios. simply do not want to install stuff on their Windows PCs, given the awful quality of software these days, which, once installed, could easily screw up your computer ģ. think that running PortableApps from a USB dongle is excruciatingly slow Ģ. This would win the hearts of those who:ġ. Surely enough, whoever doesn't want to use PortableApps in this way, they shouldn't thus use it: it's all about providing a choice. could officially open the doors to such revolutionary use of their application. With minor coding effort, PortableApps devs. I've been running it this way ever since Dropbox came about, and I can tell ya that it's mighty awesome. It certainly doesn't hurt to think outside the box a little. open themselves to this type of usage scenario-unless, of course, they are allergic to any idea of progress. Now, I know that this is not something PortableApps has been designed to achieve, however it wouldn't hurt to have PortableApps devs. Briefly, with the advent of cloud-syncing applications (Dropbox etc.), it makes the utmost sense to put your PortableApps folder in Dropbox, and hence have it automatically available on every Dropbox-synced computer you may come across. This would escalate its status considerably, at a very small developing cost. This goes hand in hand with the idea that PortableApps, while a nice little application for emergency situations, could develop nicely into something akin to a full-blown portable operating system-i.e. Yep, there's a longer story as why one would want to designate a PortableApps browser as the default Windows browser. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |